Timeline

A new style of working with AI has been clicking for me lately: keeping several projects open at once, letting the main agent spawn off sub-agents per project, then hopping between them as work lands.

The glue is AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md in each repo, which keeps every spawned agent oriented to that project's conventions while I focus on the next handoff. The loop in each project stays the same: pick a feature, write tests, document progress and findings as it goes, commit atomically.

It is genuinely engaging, more like conducting than coding, but it burns through tokens fast, especially on top-tier models like Opus 4.7 or GPT 5.5.

A few cost-saving strategies I've landed on: drop to lower-tier models where the work allows; instead of paying for the $100 tier at a single provider, take the $20 tier at both OpenAI and Anthropic and run them side by side; and lean into the fact that each model has its own strengths and weaknesses, just like any tool. It's the vim vs emacs thing again. There is no single best editor, only what suits the job in that moment (I use both, with evil-mode in Emacs as the vim layer).

I've been iterating on scripts/check_cloudflare_pages.py, and this one ended up being a pretty clean example of where Claude currently feels stronger than Codex for TUI / UI design.

Codex got the script started and helped shape the core deployment-status workflow, but when it came to making the terminal output feel actually polished, especially across both the short and verbose views, Claude was noticeably better. At its best Codex still seems to struggle a bit with this kind of presentation work, so I ended up handing the UI pass over to Claude even though Codex had started the script.

View	Codex	Claude
Short version
Verbose version

I tagged a ProjectSpire snapshot for 2026-05-11, but this one feels different because I barely did any of the implementation myself.

My Codex usage is nearly gone, so Claude carried most of the work while I was busy elsewhere: parsers for relics, potions, events, and monsters; shared parser utilities; tests; and a few devlogs.

I haven't built the UIs I need to verify Claude's parser work against the actual game properly. So I don't have that confidence in its work yet without the validation.

I miss Codex and the clearer feedback loop, the back and forth, and...

Most importantly my own deeper understanding of how everything ties together.

Tomorrow. Today has been a long day.

Almost running out of my weekly Codex / GPT token usage, so I switched to Claude for a few hours.

Somehow the experience feels much higher friction.

It likes to spend a long time thinking even for relatively simple tasks. For example: "write this devlog for me." It already had detailed guidance (ProjectSpire Devlogs CLAUDE.md) plus example documents in the same folder.

If it were GPT, it probably would have been done in seconds. Claude spent nearly a minute still "flabbergasting..." until I stopped it and asked what it was doing. Its response was essentially: "I was reading unnecessary documents."

Then there's the terminal behavior.

I wanted it to run some git commands, but it kept doing cd project-root && git ... everywhere. I genuinely do not understand why, because it can already execute commands from within the project context directly.

I explicitly told it: "cd into the project root once and then run git commands directly without repeating cd." Nope. It still kept issuing (cd ... && git ...) commands until I corrected it a second time.

I'm genuinely having a hard time getting used to working with Claude. Curious what other people's experiences have been.